CMMC-Ready AI for the Defense Industrial Base

AI Inside Your CUI Enclave.
Zero Data Egress. Zero Model Training.

We build private AI platforms for defense contractors, cleared facilities, and Tier 2/3 suppliers — deployed on Azure Government Cloud, mapped to all 110 NIST 800-171 controls, and architecturally compliant with your prime NDAs.

FedRAMP High Authorization
DoD IL4 / IL5
110 NIST Controls Mapped
Zero CUI Exposure

Your Primes Want Innovation. Your NDAs Say ‘No AI.’ Your CMMC Assessor Is Watching.

Defense suppliers are caught in a three-way bind: prime contractors expect operational efficiency gains from AI, NDA clauses appear to prohibit it, and CMMC Level 2 assessors will scrutinize any AI component in your System Security Plan. Most DIB companies conclude they can't use AI at all. They're wrong.

1

Commercial AI Is a Non-Starter

ChatGPT, Copilot, and consumer AI tools process data on external servers. For any organization handling CUI or ITAR data, using these tools is a DFARS violation, an NDA breach, and potentially an ITAR export — all in one click.

2

Your Prime's NDA Looks Like a Ban

Section 3.1.6 of most prime NDAs prohibits AI use “in a manner that does not comply with the use and disclosure restrictions.” Most legal teams read this and stop. But the clause doesn't ban AI — it bans AI that violates confidentiality. There's a critical difference.

3

CMMC Adds Another Layer

Adding AI to your environment means updating your SSP, addressing new NIST 800-171 control families (AC, AU, SC, MP), and potentially creating POA&M items. Without an architecture designed for CMMC from day one, AI becomes a compliance liability instead of an operational advantage.

4

The Result: Your Competitors Move. You Wait.

While your team manually searches PLM systems for the right spec revision, your competitors are deploying AI inside their enclaves — answering engineering questions in seconds with source citations. The gap widens every quarter.

AI That Lives Inside Your CUI Enclave

nBrain builds private AI platforms that deploy entirely inside your Azure Government subscription. Your CUI never leaves your security boundary. The AI model never trains on your data. Microsoft's Data Processing Addendum contractually guarantees it. We build the platform, hand you the keys, and your SPRS score stays intact.

Your CUI Enclave (Azure Government)

  • Your AI Brain — Custom intelligence layer built on your institutional knowledge — engineering specs, work instructions, BOMs, test procedures
  • Your Vector Database — Document embeddings stored in Azure AI Search inside your VNet — encrypted at rest (AES-256), no internet egress
  • Your Audit Trail — Every query, document retrieval, and AI response logged in Microsoft Sentinel — tamper-proof, SIEM-integrated
  • Your RBAC — Program-level access segregation — F-35 data only visible to F-35-cleared users
  • Your Source Code — Every line of code, every ARM template, every deployment config — you own it all
API Boundary

Pre-Trained LLM (Unchanged)

  • Pre-trained by Microsoft/OpenAI — Built on public internet data long before it reaches your environment
  • Stateless — Every API call is independent. No session, no memory, no retention between queries
  • Unchanged by your usage — Your CUI, ITAR data, and proprietary information do not modify the model's weights
  • Microsoft DPA Guarantee — Azure OpenAI Data Processing Addendum: your data is not used to train, retrain, or improve any model
  • Deployed in Azure Gov regions — US Gov Virginia / US Gov Arizona — US-only sovereign processing

AI as a Tool — Not AI as Training Data

This is the distinction that makes the NDA work. We use the AI model the same way you'd use a calculator: give it a problem and relevant context, get an answer, it forgets everything. Your engineering specs, work instructions, and program documents are retrieved from your vector database at query time, handed to the model as context, and discarded after the response. The model never learns. Your data never leaves your enclave. Your prime's NDA is satisfied.

What Defense Contractors Are Actually Using AI For

These aren't theoretical. These are the use cases we've built and deployed for defense manufacturers operating under CMMC, ITAR, and prime NDA constraints.

1

Engineering Spec Retrieval

An engineer asks: “What are the current thermal specifications for the DMS-R connector assembly?” The AI searches your vector database, finds the relevant spec sections across your PLM, and returns a cited answer with document number, revision, and effective date — in 10 seconds instead of 45 minutes.

PLM Integration Source Citations Revision Control
2

Work Instruction & TDP Search

Quality engineers, program managers, and shop floor leads search across Technical Data Packages, work instructions, and process specs without knowing which system or folder to look in. The AI understands semantic meaning — search by what you need, not by filename.

AS9100 Aligned Cross-System Search Audit Logged
3

AP & Finance Automation

Invoice processing, PBP/PVP milestone tracking, vendor payment reconciliation. This is the smart starting point — finance data typically doesn't contain CUI, so you can deploy immediately without waiting for your Azure Gov enclave.

Non-CUI Start ERP Integration Immediate ROI

The Parallel Strategy: Start Before Your Enclave Is Ready

The smartest defense suppliers don't wait 6-9 months for their Azure Government environment to be fully stood up. They start AI projects with non-CUI data immediately — AP automation, financial analysis, general document search. They prove the architecture, train their teams, and then migrate into the enclave when infrastructure is ready. Projects inform architecture. Architecture doesn't delay projects.

How Our AI Platform Maps to Your SSP

If you're drafting or updating your System Security Plan for CMMC Level 2, here's exactly how our AI platform architecture addresses the relevant NIST 800-171 control families. This isn't a marketing checklist — it's the mapping your DIBCAC assessor will want to see.

NIST 800-171 Control Family AI Platform Implementation Status
AC — Access Control RBAC via Microsoft Entra ID, MFA enforcement, Conditional Access policies, program-level data segregation Implemented
AU — Audit & Accountability Tamper-proof logging of every AI query, document retrieval, user action. Microsoft Sentinel SIEM integration. 90-day minimum retention. Implemented
SC — System & Comms Protection TLS 1.3 in transit, AES-256 at rest, private endpoints, VNet isolation, zero internet egress for AI pipeline Implemented
MP — Media Protection Vector embeddings encrypted at rest, stored inside Azure Gov boundary. No removable media. No data export paths. Implemented
IA — Identification & Authentication Microsoft Entra ID with MFA, Privileged Identity Management for admin access, certificate-based device auth Implemented
IR — Incident Response Automated alerting via Defender for Cloud. AI query anomaly detection. 72-hour DFARS incident reporting workflow. Implemented
CM — Configuration Management Azure Policy enforcement, infrastructure-as-code (ARM/Bicep templates), change tracking via Azure Monitor Implemented
PE — Physical & Environmental Azure Government data centers — FedRAMP High, DoD IL4/IL5, US-only sovereign regions (Gov Virginia / Gov Arizona) Azure Provided

How This Architecture Satisfies Your Prime's AI Clause

This is the question every defense supplier asks first: “Does our NDA allow this?” We've analyzed the standard AI clauses in prime contractor NDAs and designed our architecture specifically to satisfy them.

What the NDA Actually Says

Section 3.1.6 prohibits AI use “in a manner that does not comply with the use and disclosure restrictions of this Agreement.” It does not outright prohibit AI. It prohibits AI usage that violates the confidentiality rules. The distinction is everything.

Why Our Architecture Complies

Zero data retention by the LLM. Zero model training on your data. Stateless API calls inside Azure Government. Microsoft DPA guaranteeing no data use for model improvement. Every interaction audited. Data never leaves your enclave.

What Primes Actually Care About

AI as a tool = allowed. Using AI to search, summarize, and analyze documents inside your controlled environment. AI as training data = prohibited. Using proprietary data to train or fine-tune a model. We do the first. We architecturally prevent the second.

The Clarification Letter

We help you draft proactive clarification language for your primes: “Use of proprietary information within internally hosted AI tools operating in a controlled environment compliant with DFARS 252.204-7012, where the information is not used for model training, shall not constitute a prohibited use under Section 3.1.6.”

"We analyzed the NDA clause, designed the architecture to satisfy it, and built the platform for a defense electronics manufacturer handling ITAR-controlled program data. Their legal team signed off. Their prime's contracts team acknowledged the approach."

— nBrain AI, deployed for Tier 2 defense supplier under ITAR/CMMC constraints

Six Things We Put in Your SOW

These aren't marketing claims. These are contractual commitments backed by our architecture design, Microsoft's Data Processing Addendum, and our engagement terms.

1

Zero Model Training on Your CUI

Microsoft's Azure OpenAI DPA guarantees your prompts, inputs, and outputs are never used to train, retrain, or improve any model. Your CUI stays yours.

2

Every Query Is Stateless

Each API call is independent. The LLM retains nothing between queries. No session state, no conversation memory, no learning from your data.

3

You Own the Entire Platform

The Azure subscription, the source code, the ARM templates, the vector database, the Sentinel workspace — all yours. No vendor lock-in.

4

Zero Data Egress From Your Enclave

Private endpoints, VNet isolation, NSG rules, no public IP on any AI component. Your data stays inside Azure Government.

5

Full SIEM-Integrated Audit Trail

Every query, document access, and AI response logged in Sentinel. Tamper-proof. DIBCAC-ready. Exportable for your C3PAO.

6

Model-Agnostic Architecture

Swap between GPT-5, Claude Opus 4, or deploy open-source models on-premise. Your AI brain stays. The LLM engine is replaceable.

We've Already Built This for a Tier 2 Defense Supplier

We didn't build this in a lab. We built it for a defense electronics manufacturer handling CUI and ITAR-controlled data across active military programs — including F-35 DMS-R components. Here's what we delivered.

Data Security Architecture

How Your Data Stays Yours

Visual explanation of the data flow architecture — your CUI enclave on the left, the pre-trained LLM on the right, the API boundary in between. Covers Microsoft's contractual guarantees, the contractor analogy, and step-by-step query processing.

Result: The document that convinced their legal team and IT security lead that AI was NDA-compliant.

See the Data Security Architecture →
Technical Call Sheet

Secure AI Platform Build — Call Preparation

Complete technical architecture: Azure Gov stack (OpenAI Service, AI Search, Cosmos DB, App Service, Sentinel, Entra ID), compliance landscape (CMMC, NIST 800-171, DFARS, ITAR, AS9100, FedRAMP), NDA AI usage risk matrix, and RAG architecture explanation.

Result: The reference document for any defense contractor evaluating private AI deployment.

See the Technical Scope →
AI-Augmented AP Processing

Finance AI That Doesn't Need Your Enclave

AI-augmented accounts payable platform: invoice data extraction, PO matching across 9 invoices per PO, discrepancy flagging, approval routing. The non-CUI starting point that lets you prove the architecture before touching controlled data.

Result: 70% reduction in manual invoice processing. Full audit trail. Deployed without waiting for Azure Gov.

View the AP AI Scope →

"If this architecture passed scrutiny from a defense electronics manufacturer handling F-35 program data under ITAR constraints, with their prime's legal team and IT security lead reviewing every data flow — it can handle your programs."

— nBrain AI

The Defense Contractor's Guide to AI Inside the CUI Enclave

We're publishing the definitive technical guide for defense suppliers navigating AI adoption under CMMC, ITAR, and prime NDA constraints. Written for IT directors building enclaves, not vendors selling tools.

Coming Soon — White Paper

AI Inside the Enclave: How Defense Contractors Deploy Private AI Without Compromising CMMC, ITAR, or Prime NDAs

A technical guide covering the architecture patterns, NIST 800-171 control mappings, NDA clause analysis, and deployment strategies that let Tier 2/3 defense suppliers deploy AI safely inside their CUI boundary.

  • The NDA clause analysis: what Section 3.1.6 actually prohibits — and what it doesn't
  • NIST 800-171 control-by-control mapping for AI components in your SSP
  • Azure Government vs. GCC High for AI workloads: architecture comparison
  • The RAG architecture: how AI reads your TDPs without learning from them
  • The parallel strategy: starting AI projects before your enclave is fully stood up
  • Real deployment from a Tier 2 defense supplier handling ITAR program data
Get Notified When It's Published →
nBrain DIB White Paper

Your SSP Already Has 110 Controls.
Adding AI Shouldn't Create 110 More Problems.

We've done the NIST mapping. We've passed the NDA scrutiny. We've built the architecture inside Azure Government for a Tier 2 defense supplier. Book 30 minutes — we'll walk through the architecture, the control mapping, and show you a real deployment. No pitch deck.

Book Your DIB AI Architecture Review →
Danny DeMichele
Cary Johnson